of revenue, not a percentage of expenditure.
It is charged on General Revenue, and particular
exemptions are made in respect of particular
items of revenue. There is no exemption in it
at present in respect of any particular item of
expenditure. Of course it is true to a certain
extent that revenue and expenditure represent
opposite sides of the same thing and that revenue
is only raised in order to meet expenditure.
(I am not at all sure that the principle of making
the defence contribution a percentage of revenue
is really sound. It is obvious that if Hong Kong
is faced, say, with a public health emergency, it
may have to incur additional expenditure and, to
meet it, to raise additional revenue, and there is
no particular reason why this should involve it
in an increase in the defence contribution.
However, that is a general principle which has been settled (temporarily at any rate) in another
connection, and I do not want to reopen it here.
But as things are I do not think that we can
argue that there would be any particular item of
revenue which would be devoted to the air mail
subsidy and which might properly be exempted from
the defence contribution levy. Therefore, while
I suppose we cannot refuse to put to the War
Office the Governor's request for an exemption
of this item from the military contribution,
e.)
I should be disposed to accept the refusal
which we can confidently anticipate and to tell
the Governor that the matter cannot be pressed.
I
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.